Choosing the right crypto wallet setup has become a strategic decision for companies operating in Europe. As 65% of businesses demand instant payment solutions and crypto transactions are projected to grow by 250% by 2027, the wallet infrastructure a company selects has a direct impact on treasury efficiency, security, and operational resilience.
The challenge is that most wallets were designed for individual crypto users, not businesses handling cross-border payments, crypto treasury, euro settlements, or high-volume on-chain operations.
In this guide, we compare MetaMask, Ledger, and Monetum Wallets—three of the most widely considered options among European fintechs, iGaming companies, trading platforms, and Web3 teams.
This is is a business-focused breakdown, showing which wallet setup best supports a compliant, crypto-friendly, multi-wallet, and euro-connected operation.
What Each Wallet Actually Is
Monetum Wallets
A non-custodial on-chain wallet suite, integrated directly into a regulated Swiss fintech platform. Monetum doesn’t hold private keys; users retain full control.
Monetum supports:
Connecting external wallets (MetaMask, Ledger, WalletConnect-compatible wallets)
Creating new, on-chain wallets via Alchemy
Multi-wallet operations
Crypto deposits & withdrawals
Euro accounts with SEPA payments
Upcoming features: swaps (via 1inch), multi-chain support, crypto-to-euro conversion
This combination makes it the only option explicitly designed for business operations, not retail crypto use.
MetaMask
A browser-based “hot wallet” popular with Web3 users. MetaMask stores encrypted private keys locally in the browser/mobile environment. Because the environment is internet-connected, it can be exposed to device-level threats (malware, phishing, compromised extensions).
Ledger
A hardware wallet (cold storage) providing very high security. However, it is slow and operationally cumbersome for businesses needing frequent transactions or multi-wallet management.
Comparison Overview: MetaMask vs Ledger vs Monetum Wallets
| Feature | MetaMask | Ledger | Monetum Wallets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet Type | Hot wallet | Hardware cold wallet | Non-custodial business wallet suite |
| Private Key Storage | Browser/mobile | Hardware device | User-controlled (never held by Monetum) |
| Security Level | Medium | Very high | Very high |
| Multi-Wallet Support | Limited | Manual | Integrated multi-wallet |
| Team Access / Roles | No | No | Yes (inside business accounts) |
| Swap Functionality | Yes, high fees | No | Yes |
| Crypto-to-Euro Conversion | No | No | Yes |
| Best For | Individuals | Long-term holders | Crypto-active businesses |
Security & Control: The Most Critical Factor for Businesses
Security is the area where wallets differ most.
MetaMask
Stores encrypted private keys in the browser or mobile app. This is acceptable for personal use but exposes businesses to:
Device compromise
Insider threats
Lack of operational security standards
Ledger
Keys never leave the hardware device. Excellent for long-term storage, but businesses with frequent operational needs struggle with:
Physical device access
Multi-user workflows
Reconciliation delays
Monetum Wallets
Provide the benefits of both worlds:
Non-custodial on-chain wallets
Private keys never accessible by Monetum
External wallet connections
Ability to generate new wallets via Alchemy
Upcoming: Private key export, ensuring wallets remain portable across platforms.
This is the security–usability balance businesses typically need.
Operational Efficiency & Multi-Wallet Workflows
Crypto-active companies often manage:
Treasury wallets
Treasury sub-accounts
Merchant wallets
Cold and hot operational wallets
User payout flows
Team or department-specific wallets
Neither MetaMask nor Ledger were designed for this.
MetaMask
Usable, but:
No user roles
No multi-wallet dashboard
No compliance oversight
No euros or payments integration
Ledger
Secure, but daily usage quickly becomes impractical—especially for global teams working asynchronously.
Monetum Wallets
Built around real business requirements:
Multiple external wallets connected to one account
Up to 5 on-chain wallets created internally
Full visibility across all wallets
Fast deposits and withdrawals
Team permissions inside the same financial platform
Integrated euro accounts for settlements
This eliminates the need for spreadsheets, screenshots, or manually tracking wallet balances.
Fees & Swap Capabilities
MetaMask
Allows swaps, but routing can be expensive and inefficient.
Ledger
No built-in swap capability; requires external tools.
Monetum Wallets
Aggregates prices across decentralized exchanges to find the best rate:
Lower fees
Lower slippage
Higher success rate
For businesses running frequent swaps, this makes a measurable difference in operational cost.
Fiat Connectivity & Crypto-to-Euro Conversion
This is where MetaMask and Ledger simply do not compete.
MetaMask
No crypto-to-fiat options, no SEPA integration.
Ledger
Same. Hardware wallets are purely for asset storage.
Monetum Wallets
By late 2025, Monetum enables:
Crypto → EUR conversion
EUR → crypto purchases
Instant settlement to a Monetum IBAN
Powered by Kraken’s enterprise infrastructure
This turns the wallet into a bridge between crypto liquidity and banking—critical for companies needing:
Payroll
Vendor payments
Operational expenses
Cash-out of trading or iGaming revenue
Automated treasury rebalancing
No other wallet setup offers this combination.
Compliance & Business Banking Integration
Businesses in crypto-related industries—iGaming, Web3, forex, trading platforms—often face blocked accounts and banking restrictions.
A compliant bridge between crypto and euros is essential.
MetaMask & Ledger
No compliance layer. No KYC/KYB alignment. No audit trails.
Monetum Wallets
Built within a regulated Swiss payment institution:
KYB-compliant onboarding
Multiple euro IBANs
Open banking payment rails
Batch payouts
Crypto-friendly operations
24/7 risk monitoring
This makes Monetum one of the only wallet infrastructures suitable for companies requiring both on-chain activity and traditional financial operations.
Which Wallet Setup Is Best for Your Use Case?
Choose MetaMask if you are:
A small Web3 team experimenting
Handling low-value funds
Primarily interacting with dApps
Choose Ledger if you are:
Holding large amounts of crypto long-term
Managing cold storage
Not conducting frequent on-chain operations
Choose Monetum Wallets if you are:
Operating a crypto-active or hybrid euro+crypto business
Needing multi-wallet workflows
Requiring SEPA euro accounts
Preparing for crypto-to-euro settlement
Seeking a compliant, non-custodial setup
Serving users globally with fast, reliable payments
Monetum is the only option designed from the ground up to support regulated, multi-user, high-volume business usage.
FAQs
1. Are Monetum wallets custodial?
No. Monetum never holds private keys. All wallets are fully non-custodial, whether connected externally or created via Alchemy.
2. Can businesses connect multiple MetaMask or Ledger wallets?
Yes. Monetum is rolling out support for multiple external wallet connections under one business account.
3. Can Monetum swap tokens directly within the platform?
Yes. Monetum integrates the 1inch protocol for low-fee, high-success-rate swaps.
4. Does Monetum offer euro settlement?
Yes. Monetum provides SEPA euro accounts, and crypto-to-euro conversion launches in 2025 via Kraken.
5. Is Ledger still recommended for businesses?
Yes—for cold storage. But not as the main operational wallet.
Final Verdict
Ledger is excellent for cold storage.
MetaMask is convenient for Web3 interactions.
But neither provides what businesses require today:
non-custodial wallets + compliance + SEPA euros + swaps + multi-wallet visibility.
Monetum Wallets represent the only setup built for real business operations, offering a secure, compliant, and efficient bridge between on-chain assets and financial infrastructure.